Key findings
- 1
Chemistry is the hardest expert field to staff, with a scarcity index of 1.78x (1.00 is the market): its roles draw 0.12x the market's apply clicks per open role, its listings came down 32% less often than other roles of the same age on the same platforms, and it advertises $50/hr, 23% below the market median of $65/hr.
- 2
Dutch is the hardest language to staff, with a scarcity index of 1.84x (1.00 is the market): its roles draw 0.28x the market's apply clicks per open role, its listings came down 42% less often than other roles of the same age on the same platforms, and it advertises $65/hr, the market median.
- 3
Multilingual & Localization is the hardest kind of work to staff, with a scarcity index of 1.26x (1.00 is the market): its roles draw 0.59x the market's apply clicks per open role, its listings came down 14% less often than other roles of the same age on the same platforms, and it advertises $65/hr, the market median.
- 4
3 of the 43 groups with enough data are scarcer than the market on all three measures (fewer applicants per opening, slower to close than their platforms' other roles, and paid above the market): Law (1.48x), Arabic (1.29x) and Law, Medicine & Finance (1.25x).
- 5
At the other end, Robotics & Physical-AI Data (kind of work) is the easiest to staff, with an index of 0.51x: its roles draw 1.64x the market's apply clicks per open role, its listings came down 6% less often than other roles of the same age on the same platforms, and it advertises $10/hr, 85% below the market median of $65/hr.
- 6
Against their own platforms, roles in Dutch stay up longest: 12 came down where 21 would have at their platforms' pace, and its median listing lasted 25.5 days against 18 for all roles.
- 7
Law, the best-paid expert field with enough data ($109/hr, 1.68x the market median), draws 0.58x the market's apply clicks per open role, so its scarcity index is 1.48x.
- 8
43 of the 69 fields, languages and kinds of work listed have enough data on all three measures to be ranked; the rest are shown and marked as small samples.
Figure 1
Scarcity by expert field
Which professions and disciplines are hardest to recruit for AI training work?
| Expert field | Scarcity index | Applicant shortfall | Slow closing | Pay premium |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All roles (the market) | 1.00x | 1.00x | 1.00x | 1.00x |
| Chemistry | 1.78x | 5.00x | 1.48x | 0.77x |
| Physics & astronomy | 1.66x | 3.64x | 1.32x | 0.95x |
| Biology & life sciences | 1.59x | 5.00x | 0.80x | 1.00x |
| Engineering (non-software) | 1.48x | 2.59x | 1.25x | 1.00x |
| Law | 1.48x | 1.73x | 1.11x | 1.68x |
| Mathematics & statistics | 1.18x | 1.62x | 1.03x | 1.00x |
| Voice acting, music & sound | 1.15x | 1.38x | 0.97x | 1.15x |
| Finance, accounting & economics | 1.11x | 1.21x | 0.92x | 1.23x |
| Psychology & mental health | 1.09x | 1.20x | 0.74x | 1.46x |
| Medicine & nursing | 1.05x | 1.09x | 0.98x | 1.08x |
| Humanities & social sciences | 0.97x | 1.29x | 0.72x | 1.00x |
| Software & computer science | 0.96x | 0.81x | 1.11x | 1.00x |
| Design & visual arts | 0.95x | 1.02x | 0.77x | 1.08x |
| Business, sales & consulting | 0.85x | 0.74x | 0.82x | 1.00x |
| Writing, editing & journalism | 0.66x | 0.41x | 0.96x | 0.73x |
| Education & teachingSmall sample | 0.63x | 0.47x | 0.65x | 0.82x |
| Trust, safety & child protectionSmall sample | n/a | 5.00x | 5.00x | n/a |
Sample. 17 expert fields named in the titles of roles open at the end of 17 Oct 2026; apply clicks from 20 Sep 2026 to 17 Oct 2026; listing lifetimes of the 3,542 roles listed from 3 Aug 2026 to 17 Oct 2026.
Scarcity index: the geometric mean of the three ratios beside it, each held between 0.20 and 5.00 so one extreme reading cannot decide it alone. 1.00 is the average role; above 1, harder to staff.
Applicant shortfall: the apply clicks the group's roles would have drawn at the market's rate per open role, over the clicks they drew from 20 Sep 2026 to 17 Oct 2026 (one over the demand index). Above 1, fewer applicants per opening than the market.
Slow closing: the removals expected if each of the group's roles listed from 3 Aug 2026 to 17 Oct 2026 had come down at its own platform's pace for a role of the same age (its Kaplan-Meier hazard), over the removals seen by the end of 17 Oct 2026. Above 1, its roles stay up longer than other roles on the same platforms. It is read against the same platforms because how long a listing stays up depends first on how its platform posts.
Pay premium: the median advertised hourly rate of the group's roles open at the end of 17 Oct 2026 over the median of every open role stating one ($65/hr).
A row is ranked only when its roles would have drawn at least 30 clicks at the market's rate, at least 10 removals were expected, at least 8 of its open roles state an hourly rate and at least 10 are open; otherwise it is marked as a small sample. A ratio capped at 5.00 means no click, or no removal, was recorded.
A role counts for an expert field when its title names it (whole words, the vocabulary of the expert fields report), and counts for each one it names. Titles that name none are not counted.
Source. AITraining.jobs Research, The Expert Scarcity Index for AI Training, live data.
Figure 2
Scarcity by language
Which languages are hardest to recruit for AI training work?
| Language | Scarcity index | Applicant shortfall | Slow closing | Pay premium |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All roles (the market) | 1.00x | 1.00x | 1.00x | 1.00x |
| Dutch | 1.84x | 3.60x | 1.73x | 1.00x |
| German | 1.70x | 2.89x | 1.71x | 1.00x |
| Italian | 1.36x | 2.03x | 1.25x | 1.00x |
| Arabic | 1.29x | 1.37x | 1.01x | 1.54x |
| Thai | 1.23x | 2.85x | 1.45x | 0.45x |
| Korean | 1.18x | 1.98x | 0.82x | 1.00x |
| Swedish | 1.09x | 2.87x | 0.45x | 1.00x |
| French | 1.09x | 2.71x | 0.62x | 0.77x |
| Portuguese | 1.02x | 0.93x | 1.15x | 1.00x |
| Japanese | 0.97x | 0.91x | 1.02x | 1.00x |
| Spanish | 0.91x | 0.86x | 1.09x | 0.79x |
| Russian | 0.85x | 1.01x | 1.07x | 0.56x |
| Chinese (Mandarin) | 0.74x | 0.78x | 0.97x | 0.54x |
| Hindi | 0.72x | 0.76x | 0.89x | 0.56x |
| English | 0.69x | 0.58x | 1.20x | 0.46x |
| Vietnamese | 0.67x | 0.63x | 1.12x | 0.42x |
| FinnishSmall sample | 2.21x | 4.35x | 1.61x | 1.54x |
| DanishSmall sample | 1.90x | 5.00x | 0.90x | 1.54x |
| NorwegianSmall sample | 1.57x | 3.29x | 1.40x | 0.85x |
| PolishSmall sample | 1.54x | 2.88x | 0.83x | 1.54x |
| HebrewSmall sample | 1.50x | 1.15x | 1.92x | 1.54x |
| HungarianSmall sample | 1.46x | 5.00x | 1.24x | 0.50x |
| PunjabiSmall sample | 1.41x | 2.51x | 2.91x | 0.38x |
| CroatianSmall sample | 1.36x | 5.00x | 1.20x | 0.42x |
| CatalanSmall sample | 1.24x | 5.00x | 0.97x | 0.39x |
| CzechSmall sample | 1.06x | 2.79x | 0.92x | 0.46x |
| MarathiSmall sample | 1.05x | 2.56x | 0.98x | 0.46x |
| TeluguSmall sample | 1.01x | 1.47x | 2.26x | 0.31x |
| Filipino (Tagalog)Small sample | 0.92x | 2.37x | 0.59x | 0.56x |
| TamilSmall sample | 0.91x | 1.07x | 1.91x | 0.37x |
| MalaySmall sample | 0.86x | 2.87x | 0.53x | 0.42x |
| TurkishSmall sample | 0.79x | 1.09x | 1.01x | 0.45x |
| GujaratiSmall sample | 0.79x | 1.76x | 0.89x | 0.31x |
| BengaliSmall sample | 0.77x | 0.99x | 1.32x | 0.35x |
| IndonesianSmall sample | 0.65x | 0.76x | 0.64x | 0.56x |
| RomanianSmall sample | n/a | 3.18x | 1.08x | n/a |
| UkrainianSmall sample | n/a | 2.43x | 0.69x | n/a |
| UrduSmall sample | n/a | 0.73x | 0.87x | n/a |
| BulgarianSmall sample | n/a | 1.78x | 1.40x | n/a |
| CantoneseSmall sample | n/a | 3.09x | 2.31x | n/a |
Sample. 40 languages named in the titles of roles open at the end of 17 Oct 2026 (the 40 with the most open roles); apply clicks from 20 Sep 2026 to 17 Oct 2026; listing lifetimes of the 3,542 roles listed from 3 Aug 2026 to 17 Oct 2026.
Scarcity index: the geometric mean of the three ratios beside it, each held between 0.20 and 5.00 so one extreme reading cannot decide it alone. 1.00 is the average role; above 1, harder to staff.
Applicant shortfall: the apply clicks the group's roles would have drawn at the market's rate per open role, over the clicks they drew from 20 Sep 2026 to 17 Oct 2026 (one over the demand index). Above 1, fewer applicants per opening than the market.
Slow closing: the removals expected if each of the group's roles listed from 3 Aug 2026 to 17 Oct 2026 had come down at its own platform's pace for a role of the same age (its Kaplan-Meier hazard), over the removals seen by the end of 17 Oct 2026. Above 1, its roles stay up longer than other roles on the same platforms. It is read against the same platforms because how long a listing stays up depends first on how its platform posts.
Pay premium: the median advertised hourly rate of the group's roles open at the end of 17 Oct 2026 over the median of every open role stating one ($65/hr).
A row is ranked only when its roles would have drawn at least 30 clicks at the market's rate, at least 10 removals were expected, at least 8 of its open roles state an hourly rate and at least 10 are open; otherwise it is marked as a small sample. A ratio capped at 5.00 means no click, or no removal, was recorded.
A role counts for a language when its title names it (whole words, the vocabulary of the languages report), and counts for each one it names. Titles that name none are not counted.
Visitors are shown the roles open in their country first, which lowers the clicks on roles limited to a few countries, as many language roles are.
Source. AITraining.jobs Research, The Expert Scarcity Index for AI Training, live data.
Figure 3
Scarcity by kind of work
Which kinds of AI training work are hardest to staff?
| Kind of work | Scarcity index | Applicant shortfall | Slow closing | Pay premium |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All roles (the market) | 1.00x | 1.00x | 1.00x | 1.00x |
| Multilingual & Localization | 1.26x | 1.70x | 1.16x | 1.00x |
| Law, Medicine & Finance | 1.25x | 1.65x | 1.11x | 1.08x |
| Math & STEM | 1.15x | 1.67x | 0.90x | 1.00x |
| Research Studies & Surveys | 1.04x | 0.88x | 0.82x | 1.54x |
| Coding & Software Evaluation | 0.99x | 0.93x | 1.05x | 1.00x |
| Red-Teaming & AI Safety | 0.91x | 0.88x | 0.78x | 1.08x |
| Transcription, Audio & Speech | 0.80x | 0.83x | 1.33x | 0.46x |
| Agentic Tasks & RL Environments | 0.76x | 0.49x | 1.15x | 0.77x |
| AI Evaluation & Rating (RLHF) | 0.61x | 0.41x | 0.66x | 0.84x |
| Writing & Content | 0.57x | 0.30x | 0.82x | 0.75x |
| Data Annotation & Labeling | 0.51x | 0.39x | 0.71x | 0.46x |
| Robotics & Physical-AI Data | 0.51x | 0.61x | 1.06x | 0.20x |
Sample. 12 kinds of work with roles open at the end of 17 Oct 2026; apply clicks from 20 Sep 2026 to 17 Oct 2026; listing lifetimes of the 3,542 roles listed from 3 Aug 2026 to 17 Oct 2026.
Scarcity index: the geometric mean of the three ratios beside it, each held between 0.20 and 5.00 so one extreme reading cannot decide it alone. 1.00 is the average role; above 1, harder to staff.
Applicant shortfall: the apply clicks the group's roles would have drawn at the market's rate per open role, over the clicks they drew from 20 Sep 2026 to 17 Oct 2026 (one over the demand index). Above 1, fewer applicants per opening than the market.
Slow closing: the removals expected if each of the group's roles listed from 3 Aug 2026 to 17 Oct 2026 had come down at its own platform's pace for a role of the same age (its Kaplan-Meier hazard), over the removals seen by the end of 17 Oct 2026. Above 1, its roles stay up longer than other roles on the same platforms. It is read against the same platforms because how long a listing stays up depends first on how its platform posts.
Pay premium: the median advertised hourly rate of the group's roles open at the end of 17 Oct 2026 over the median of every open role stating one ($65/hr).
A row is ranked only when its roles would have drawn at least 30 clicks at the market's rate, at least 10 removals were expected, at least 8 of its open roles state an hourly rate and at least 10 are open; otherwise it is marked as a small sample. A ratio capped at 5.00 means no click, or no removal, was recorded.
Every role is classified into one kind of work.
Source. AITraining.jobs Research, The Expert Scarcity Index for AI Training, live data.
Figure 4
What each scarcity index is made of
What applicant interest, listing lifetime and pay lie behind each group's scarcity index?
| Group | Open on 17 Oct 2026 | Clicks per open role a week | Median advertised pay | Median days listed | Scarcity index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All roles | 3,668 | 0.38 | $65 | 18.0 | 1.00x |
| Multilingual & Localization | 1,004 | 0.22 | $65 | 25.5 | 1.26x |
| Law, Medicine & Finance | 1,108 | 0.23 | $70 | 20.0 | 1.25x |
| Math & STEM | 218 | 0.23 | $65 | 19.4 | 1.15x |
| Research Studies & Surveys | 34 | 0.43 | $100 | 11.8 | 1.04x |
| Coding & Software Evaluation | 284 | 0.40 | $65 | 17.0 | 0.99x |
| Red-Teaming & AI Safety | 54 | 0.43 | $70 | 17.2 | 0.91x |
| Transcription, Audio & Speech | 521 | 0.45 | $30 | 29.1 | 0.80x |
| Agentic Tasks & RL Environments | 64 | 0.77 | $50 | 8.3 | 0.76x |
| AI Evaluation & Rating (RLHF) | 143 | 0.92 | $55 | 18.0 | 0.61x |
| Writing & Content | 34 | 1.25 | $49 | 11.8 | 0.57x |
| Data Annotation & Labeling | 139 | 0.96 | $30 | 12.0 | 0.51x |
| Robotics & Physical-AI Data | 65 | 0.62 | $10 | 9.3 | 0.51x |
| Chemistry | 73 | 0.05 | $50 | 27.1 | 1.78x |
| Physics & astronomy | 73 | 0.10 | $62 | 32.1 | 1.66x |
| Biology & life sciences | 73 | 0.03 | $65 | 14.0 | 1.59x |
| Engineering (non-software) | 155 | 0.15 | $65 | 15.8 | 1.48x |
| Law | 87 | 0.22 | $109 | 27.1 | 1.48x |
| Mathematics & statistics | 78 | 0.23 | $65 | 20.0 | 1.18x |
| Voice acting, music & sound | 116 | 0.27 | $75 | 20.5 | 1.15x |
| Finance, accounting & economics | 181 | 0.31 | $80 | 19.4 | 1.11x |
| Psychology & mental health | 24 | 0.32 | $95 | 13.0 | 1.09x |
| Medicine & nursing | 164 | 0.35 | $70 | 19.3 | 1.05x |
| Humanities & social sciences | 36 | 0.29 | $65 | 26.8 | 0.97x |
| Software & computer science | 280 | 0.47 | $65 | 13.4 | 0.96x |
| Design & visual arts | 70 | 0.37 | $70 | 14.0 | 0.95x |
| Business, sales & consulting | 110 | 0.51 | $65 | 18.0 | 0.85x |
| Writing, editing & journalism | 89 | 0.93 | $48 | 20.0 | 0.66x |
| Education & teachingSmall sample | 31 | 0.80 | $53 | 27.0 | 0.63x |
| Trust, safety & child protectionSmall sample | 15 | 0.05 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Dutch | 54 | 0.11 | $65 | 25.5 | 1.84x |
| German | 107 | 0.13 | $65 | 24.5 | 1.70x |
| Italian | 61 | 0.19 | $65 | 15.5 | 1.36x |
| Arabic | 100 | 0.28 | $100 | 21.0 | 1.29x |
| Thai | 18 | 0.13 | $30 | 25.5 | 1.23x |
| Korean | 69 | 0.19 | $65 | 12.0 | 1.18x |
| Swedish | 34 | 0.13 | $65 | n/a | 1.09x |
| French | 80 | 0.14 | $50 | 9.5 | 1.09x |
| Portuguese | 75 | 0.41 | $65 | 25.5 | 1.02x |
| Japanese | 67 | 0.42 | $65 | 20.0 | 0.97x |
| Spanish | 109 | 0.44 | $51 | 27.0 | 0.91x |
| Russian | 22 | 0.37 | $37 | n/a | 0.85x |
| Chinese (Mandarin) | 69 | 0.49 | $35 | 16.3 | 0.74x |
| Hindi | 29 | 0.50 | $37 | 25.5 | 0.72x |
| English | 163 | 0.65 | $30 | 48.0 | 0.69x |
| Vietnamese | 27 | 0.60 | $28 | n/a | 0.67x |
| FinnishSmall sample | 28 | 0.09 | $100 | n/a | 2.21x |
| DanishSmall sample | 29 | 0.04 | $100 | n/a | 1.90x |
| NorwegianSmall sample | 15 | 0.11 | $55 | 27.5 | 1.57x |
| PolishSmall sample | 35 | 0.13 | $100 | n/a | 1.54x |
| HebrewSmall sample | 35 | 0.33 | $100 | n/a | 1.50x |
| HungarianSmall sample | 12 | 0.02 | $33 | n/a | 1.46x |
| PunjabiSmall sample | 14 | 0.15 | $25 | n/a | 1.41x |
| CroatianSmall sample | 11 | 0.06 | $27 | n/a | 1.36x |
| CatalanSmall sample | 10 | 0.05 | $26 | n/a | 1.24x |
| CzechSmall sample | 15 | 0.14 | $30 | n/a | 1.06x |
| MarathiSmall sample | 18 | 0.15 | $30 | 8.0 | 1.05x |
| TeluguSmall sample | 20 | 0.26 | $20 | n/a | 1.01x |
| Filipino (Tagalog)Small sample | 14 | 0.16 | $37 | n/a | 0.92x |
| TamilSmall sample | 18 | 0.35 | $24 | n/a | 0.91x |
| MalaySmall sample | 12 | 0.13 | $28 | n/a | 0.86x |
| TurkishSmall sample | 15 | 0.35 | $29 | 8.0 | 0.79x |
| GujaratiSmall sample | 12 | 0.21 | $20 | n/a | 0.79x |
| BengaliSmall sample | 21 | 0.38 | $23 | n/a | 0.77x |
| IndonesianSmall sample | 24 | 0.50 | $37 | 13.0 | 0.65x |
| RomanianSmall sample | 11 | 0.12 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| UkrainianSmall sample | 10 | 0.16 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| UrduSmall sample | 10 | 0.52 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| BulgarianSmall sample | 9 | 0.21 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| CantoneseSmall sample | 9 | 0.12 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Sample. Every group in the three scarcity tables. Open roles and pay at the end of 17 Oct 2026; new listings and apply clicks from 20 Sep 2026 to 17 Oct 2026; lifetimes and removals over the 3,542 roles listed from 3 Aug 2026 to 17 Oct 2026, back catalogues left out.
Clicks per open role a week: apply clicks on AITraining.jobs over the days the group's roles were open, times 7. Demand index: that rate over the market's (0.38).
Median days listed: the Kaplan-Meier median from the listing date to the last sighting, as in the listing-lifetime report (n/a when more than half of the group's roles are still listed at the oldest age it can be read at, or fewer than 10 were listed that long ago). It mixes how each platform posts with how fast roles fill, so the index uses the removals against the same platforms' pace instead.
Removed: roles of the cohort that came down. Expected: the removals the same roles would have had at their platforms' hazard for each age; over all roles the two are equal.
Median advertised pay: the hourly figure postings state (the middle of a stated range), shown with at least 8 roles stating one.
Source. AITraining.jobs Research, The Expert Scarcity Index for AI Training, live data.
Figure 5
Hardest to staff: scarcer than the market on every measure
Which expertise is short of applicants, slow to close and paid above the market, all at once?
| Group | Scarcity index | Applicant shortfall | Slow closing | Pay premium |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law | 1.48x | 1.73x | 1.11x | 1.68x |
| Arabic | 1.29x | 1.37x | 1.01x | 1.54x |
| Law, Medicine & Finance | 1.25x | 1.65x | 1.11x | 1.08x |
Sample. 3 of the 43 fields, languages and kinds of work with enough data on every measure, at the end of 17 Oct 2026.
Listed when all three ratios are above 1.00: fewer applicants per opening than the market, roles staying up longer than other roles on the same platforms, and a median advertised rate above the market's.
A role can count for a field, a language and a kind of work at once, so one set of roles can appear on several rows.
Source. AITraining.jobs Research, The Expert Scarcity Index for AI Training, live data.
For labs, data vendors and researchers
Buy the data behind this report
The figures above are a summary. Behind them are records we collect ourselves, every day:
10,289 roles tracked, each with its history
Every role on 29 job boards, read daily since 13 Jul 2026: its pay and place, and the first and last day it was open.
6,200 apply clicks in 28 days
Which roles people actually apply to, by field, pay and kind of work. It happens on this site, so nobody else can count it.
39 lab and vendor hiring boards
The job boards of 25 AI labs and 14 human-data vendors, read every day: who is hiring for human data, and who is hiring to buy it.
What you can buy
The records
The rows behind any figure, with their history, not only the totals.
A regular feed
The same figures every week or month, as files.
A custom cut or benchmark
Your countries, languages or fields, or your own platform against the market.
Method and definitions
The public job boards of the AI training platforms this site tracks, read every day, and the apply clicks people make on AITraining.jobs. Fields and languages are read from role titles. Every figure is computed by one database query over the window shown, the same query for the live report and for every edition. Each figure states its sample beneath it.
- Scarcity index
- The geometric mean of the applicant shortfall, the slow-closing ratio and the pay premium, each held between 0.2 and 5 so one extreme reading cannot decide it alone. 1.00 is the average AI training role; above 1, the group is harder to staff.
- Applicant shortfall
- The apply clicks a group's roles would have drawn at the market's rate per open role, divided by the clicks they drew in the window: one over the demand index. Above 1, fewer applicants per opening than the market.
- Slow closing
- For every role listed in the last 26 weeks (from 3 Aug 2026 at the earliest; back catalogues left out), the chance it comes down at each age is read from its own platform's Kaplan-Meier curve; summed over the group's roles, that gives the removals expected at its platforms' pace. Slow closing is expected removals over removals seen. Above 1, the group's roles stay listed longer than other roles of the same age on the same platforms.
- Pay premium
- The median advertised hourly rate of the group's open roles over the median of every open role stating one. Needs at least 8 roles stating a rate.
- Median days listed
- The Kaplan-Meier median from the listing date to the last sighting, as in the listing-lifetime report. Published beside the index; not part of it, because it depends first on how each platform posts.
- Ranked
- A group is ranked when its roles would have drawn at least 30 clicks at the market's rate, at least 10 removals were expected, at least 8 of its open roles state an hourly rate and at least 10 are open. Other groups are shown and marked as small samples.
- Expert field and language
- Named in a role's title, matched as whole words with the vocabularies of the expert fields and languages reports. A role naming two counts for both.
- Open role
- A role listed by a given day and still in its platform's feed that day.
- Kind of work
- Each role is classified from its title and description into one of the twelve kinds of AI training work this site tracks. Every kind links to its own page.
- Window
- Live: the last 28 complete days, in UTC, with listing lifetimes over every role listed in the 26 weeks to the same end (from 3 Aug 2026 at the earliest). Edition: one calendar month, with lifetimes over every role listed in the 26 weeks to its end, followed to its end.
What this data cannot tell you
- Applicant interest is measured among the people who use AITraining.jobs, not across the market, and what is shown first gets clicked more: each visitor sees the roles open in their country first, which lowers the clicks on roles limited to a few countries, as many language roles are.
- A listing coming down is not a hire: a role can close because it filled, because the project ended or because the platform re-posts it. Reading it against the same platforms removes each platform's posting habits, not the reasons a particular role closed.
- Pay is what postings advertise, not what workers earn, and part of a gap between groups is where they hire: many platforms set lower rates in lower-cost countries.
- Generic titles hide the field or language of many roles, so a group's counts are a floor; a role can count for a field, a language and a kind of work at once.
- Platforms that recruit without a public job board are not counted.
How the job feeds are read and roles are classified: site methodology. How fresh, complete and consistent the data is, checked every day: data quality and coverage.
Editions
The live report covers the last 28 complete days and changes every day. Each complete month is also published as an edition, frozen two days after the month ends, so a figure you cite from an edition never moves.
- Live data (this page)Last 28 complete days, recomputed daily
- September 2026 editionFrozen 11 Oct 2026
- August 2026 editionFrozen 11 Oct 2026
Cite and reuse
Free to quote, chart and republish under CC BY 4.0 with a link to this page. Live figures change daily: cite a monthly edition for numbers that will read the same later, or keep the access date.
Citation
AITraining.jobs (2026). The Expert Scarcity Index for AI Training (live data, 20 Sep 2026 to 17 Oct 2026). https://aitraining.run/research/expert-scarcity-index (accessed 18 Oct 2026)
BibTeX
@misc{aitrainingjobs_expert_scarcity_index_live,
author = {{AITraining.jobs}},
title = {The Expert Scarcity Index for AI Training (live data, 20 Sep 2026 to 17 Oct 2026)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://aitraining.run/research/expert-scarcity-index}},
note = {Accessed 18 Oct 2026},
}More research
- Languages in Demand for AI TrainingWhich languages are AI labs hiring for, what do they pay and how much competition is there?Read the report
- Expert Fields in Demand for AI TrainingWhich professions and disciplines are AI labs hiring to train models, and what do they pay?Read the report
- What AI Training Roles RequireWhat do AI training roles ask for: degrees, credentials, experience, hours, tests?Read the report
- AI Training Job TitlesWhat is AI training work called, and does the title say anything about the pay?Read the report
- Programming Languages in AI TrainingWhich programming languages are AI labs hiring coders to train models in, and what does each pay?Read the report
- What AI Trainers DoWhat tasks does AI training work involve: writing prompts, rating answers, red-teaming, coding?Read the report
- Real-World Data Collection WorkWho is hiring people to collect real-world data for robots and physical AI, where, and at what pay?Read the report
- The State of AI Training PayWhat does AI training work pay, by kind of work and by platform?Read the report