Skip to content

Research report ยท Live data

The Market for Coding & Software Evaluation Work

On 18 Oct 2026, 331 roles in Coding & Software Evaluation were open on 22 platforms (SuperAnnotate (SME) listed 19.3%); their median advertised rate was $65/hr, about the same as the $65/hr of all AI training work; each open role drew 1.19x the apply clicks of the average role.

Data window
21 Sep 2026 to 18 Oct 2026
28 days, UTC
Computed
19 Oct 2026, 17:22 UTC
Recomputed every day
Source
The public job boards of the AI training platforms this site tracks, read every day. Apply clicks are made on AITraining.jobs; full descriptions come from the platforms whose boards publish them.
Method
Version 2. Definitions
CC BY 4.0, how to cite

Every figure on this page as CSV and JSON, sent to your work email.

Key findings

  1. 1

    Between the week of 3 Aug 2026 and the week of 12 Oct 2026, open roles in Coding & Software Evaluation on the platforms tracked since 3 Aug 2026 went down 7.5%, from about 142 to 131, against +37.9% for all AI training work on the same platforms; platforms first tracked later, left out of this panel, listed about 169 more in the week of 12 Oct 2026.

    Figure 1
  2. 2

    22 platforms listed the 331 open roles in Coding & Software Evaluation; SuperAnnotate (SME) held 19.3% and the three largest 45.0% (HHI 1,047, unconcentrated, against 597 for all AI training work).

    Figure 3
  3. 3

    297 of the 331 open roles in Coding & Software Evaluation (89.7%) stated an hourly rate, with a median of $65/hr (middle half $55 to $75), about the same as the $65/hr of all AI training work.

    Figure 4
  4. 4

    Each open role in Coding & Software Evaluation drew 0.57 apply clicks a week on AITraining.jobs, 1.19x the average AI training role: the 6th highest of 12 kinds of work with enough clicks to rank.

    Figure 6
  5. 5

    39.3% of the 331 open roles in Coding & Software Evaluation accepted applicants from any country, against 26.7% of all AI training roles; of the 20 countries compared, residents of the United States (249), India (211) and Germany (176) could apply to the most, and residents of Palestine to the fewest (130).

    Figure 9
  6. 6

    The words used most in the titles of open roles in Coding & Software Evaluation were Engineer or developer (170), Specialist (68) and Trainer (63), of 331 open roles.

    Figure 10
  7. 7

    Of the 286 open roles in Coding & Software Evaluation with a full description, 28.7% mention a PhD or master's degree, 2.4% a professional credential and 11.2% an assessment or test; the 137 stating years of experience ask for a median of 3 years.

    Figure 11
  8. 8

    Over the 28 days from 21 Sep 2026 to 18 Oct 2026, open roles in Coding & Software Evaluation on the platforms tracked at its start went down 24.5% (212 to 160): platforms listed 138 new roles and removed 206, and a removed role had been listed for a median of 49 days (33 across all AI training work).

    Figure 2

Figure 1

Open roles, week by week

Is the number of open roles in Coding & Software Evaluation rising or falling?

WeekOpen roles (fixed panel)Index
3 to 9 Aug
142
100.0
10 to 16 Aug
139
98.0
17 to 23 Aug
126
88.9
24 to 30 Aug
127
90.0
31 Aug to 6 Sep
115
80.9
7 to 13 Sep
111
78.6
14 to 20 Sep
116
81.8
21 to 27 Sep
124
87.7
28 Sep to 4 Oct
119
83.9
5 to 11 Oct
112
79.2
12 to 18 Oct
131
92.5

Sample. Average open roles in Coding & Software Evaluation over each week's days, on the 16 platforms tracked since 3 Aug 2026 (the fixed panel; 13 of them list this work), 3 Aug 2026 to 18 Oct 2026.

The index is the panel's open roles against the week of 3 Aug 2026 (100), beside the same index for all AI training work on the same platforms.

OpenTrain AI (first tracked 5 Sep 2026), SuperAnnotate (SME) (first tracked 10 Oct 2026), Turing (first tracked 10 Oct 2026), RemoExperts (first tracked 10 Oct 2026), Sovrano AI (first tracked 11 Oct 2026), Anyone AI (first tracked 11 Oct 2026), Vetto (first tracked 14 Oct 2026), Claru (first tracked 14 Oct 2026), Pasiflora AI (first tracked 14 Oct 2026), Weekday (first tracked 18 Oct 2026), Innodata (first tracked 18 Oct 2026), Rise Data Labs (first tracked 18 Oct 2026), Volga Partners (first tracked 18 Oct 2026), Lifted (Upwork) (first tracked 18 Oct 2026) and Scale AI Human Frontier Collective (first tracked 18 Oct 2026) list this work but were added to the dataset later, so they are left out of the panel and counted only in the last column: a platform's arrival never reads as growth.

Weeks with fewer than 10 open roles on the panel, or cut by the span, are marked.

The series starts in the week of 3 Aug 2026 at the earliest: before it, this dataset's feeds were still being added and tuned.

Source. AITraining.jobs Research, The Market for Coding & Software Evaluation Work, live data.

Figure 2

Listings added and removed

How fast do roles in Coding & Software Evaluation turn over, and is the stock growing on the same platforms?

WorkOpen on 21 Sep 2026Open on 18 Oct 2026, same platformsChangeNew listings
Coding & Software Evaluation212160
-24.5%
138
All AI training work2,6052,827
+8.5%
2,401

Sample. Roles listed from 21 Sep 2026 to 18 Oct 2026: 537 in Coding & Software Evaluation, 6,590 across all AI training work.

Change compares the roles open on the first and the last day of the window on the platforms tracked when it opened, so a platform added during the window does not read as growth.

A new listing first appeared in the window on a platform already tracked before that week; a platform's first week (its back catalogue) is not counted.

Median days listed runs from a removed role's listing date to its last sighting, for removed roles with a known listing date (at least 10; 204 here).

Source. AITraining.jobs Research, The Market for Coding & Software Evaluation Work, live data.

Figure 3

Who lists it

Which platforms list roles in Coding & Software Evaluation, and what does each advertise?

Sample. 331 roles in Coding & Software Evaluation open at the end of 18 Oct 2026, by the platform that lists them: HHI 1,047 (unconcentrated), against 597 for all AI training work.

HHI: the sum of every platform's squared percentage share of the open roles, 0 to 10,000; under 1,500 is unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately and above 2,500 highly concentrated (US merger-guideline thresholds).

Shares are of listings, not of people hired or money paid: a platform posting one role per language or country weighs more here than its hiring may.

A median needs at least 8 roles stating an hourly rate.

Source. AITraining.jobs Research, The Market for Coding & Software Evaluation Work, live data.

Figure 4

What it pays

What do roles in Coding & Software Evaluation advertise per hour, against AI training work as a whole?

WorkMedian per hour25th percentile75th percentileStating an hourly rate
Coding & Software Evaluation$55$7589.7%
All AI training work$35$9082.5%

Sample. Roles open on 18 Oct 2026: 331 in Coding & Software Evaluation, 297 of them stating an hourly rate; 4,354 across all AI training work.

Pay is the hourly figure the posting advertises (the middle of a stated range). The middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile.

Roles paid per task or per project, or that state no figure, do not state an hourly rate. A median needs at least 8 roles stating one.

Source. AITraining.jobs Research, The Market for Coding & Software Evaluation Work, live data.

Figure 5

How its rates are distributed

What share of roles in Coding & Software Evaluation pay $50 an hour or more?

Advertised rateOpen rolesShare of priced rolesAll AI training work
Under $15/hr1
0.3%
5.5%
$15 to $25/hr12
4.0%
9.0%
$25 to $35/hr23
7.7%
10.4%
$35 to $50/hr28
9.4%
15.0%
$50 to $75/hr142
47.8%
23.1%
$75 to $100/hr63
21.2%
14.6%
$100 to $150/hr17
5.7%
17.5%
$150/hr or more11
3.7%
4.8%

Sample. 297 roles in Coding & Software Evaluation open on 18 Oct 2026 that state an hourly rate, against 3,593 across all AI training work.

Each role counts once, at the middle of its advertised range. The bands are those of the pay-transparency report.

Source. AITraining.jobs Research, The Market for Coding & Software Evaluation Work, live data.

Figure 6

Applicant demand per open role

Do roles in Coding & Software Evaluation draw more or fewer applicants per opening than the average AI training role?

RolesClicks per role a weekIndex
Coding & Software Evaluation
0.57
1.19x
All AI training work
0.48
1.00x
Its roles stating an hourly rate
0.62
1.30x
Its roles stating no hourly rateSmall sample
0.22
0.45x
Its roles open worldwide
0.84
1.76x
Its roles limited by country
0.44
0.92x

Sample. Apply clicks on a specific role on AITraining.jobs, from 21 Sep 2026 to 18 Oct 2026: 548 on roles in Coding & Software Evaluation, against the days those roles were open.

Clicks per role a week = apply clicks / (open role-days / 7). Index 1.00 is the rate of every role on the site.

Rows with fewer than 30 clicks or 3 roles open on an average day are marked as a small sample.

Apply clicks measure interest among visitors to AITraining.jobs, who see roles open in their country and recent, priced roles first. Clicks are never split by platform.

Source. AITraining.jobs Research, The Market for Coding & Software Evaluation Work, live data.

Figure 7

Applicant demand by listing age

Do newer roles in Coding & Software Evaluation draw more applicants than older ones?

Listing ageClicks per role a weekIndex (this work = 1)
Listed during the window
1.40
2.46x
Listed up to 4 weeks before it
0.37
0.65x
Listed 4 to 12 weeks before it
0.18
0.31x
Listed more than 12 weeks before it
0.64
1.12x
Listing date unknownSmall sample
1.42
2.51x

Sample. Apply clicks on roles in Coding & Software Evaluation, from 21 Sep 2026 to 18 Oct 2026, by when each role was listed relative to the window's first day (21 Sep 2026).

Listing date: the date the job board gives for the posting, or else the first day the role appeared in the feed. A role that arrived with a platform's back catalogue and gives no date has none.

The index divides each row's rate by the rate of all roles in this kind of work, so it reads within the kind.

Rows with fewer than 30 clicks or 3 roles open on an average day are marked as a small sample.

Source. AITraining.jobs Research, The Market for Coding & Software Evaluation Work, live data.

Figure 8

Who may apply: location rules

Can people apply to roles in Coding & Software Evaluation from anywhere?

Location ruleOpen rolesShare of its open rolesAll AI training work
Open worldwide13026.7%
Worldwide except listed countries20
6.0%
7.9%
Only listed countries181
54.7%
65.1%
No rule stated0
0.0%
0.3%

Sample. 331 roles in Coding & Software Evaluation open at the end of 18 Oct 2026, against 4,354 across all AI training work.

The rule is read from each posting's location text, then, where that names no country, from what the posting's own description states, and where both are silent from what the platform states about where it hires.

Source. AITraining.jobs Research, The Market for Coding & Software Evaluation Work, live data.

Figure 9

Who may apply: roles open to each country

How many roles in Coding & Software Evaluation can a resident of each country apply to?

Sample. 331 roles in Coding & Software Evaluation open at the end of 18 Oct 2026, for residents of a fixed set of 20 countries.

A country's count is the roles open worldwide (including roles that state no rule, as on the job board), plus roles whose list names it, plus roles whose exclusion list does not.

The 20 countries are the same in every report of this series: those named most often by the location rules of open AI training roles on 9 Oct 2026, either as the only countries accepted or as excluded.

Median pay is over the roles open to that country that state an hourly rate (at least 8).

Source. AITraining.jobs Research, The Market for Coding & Software Evaluation Work, live data.

Figure 10

What the roles are called

What are roles in Coding & Software Evaluation called: annotator, evaluator, expert or trainer?

Title wordOpen rolesShare of its open roles
Engineer or developer
170
51.4%
Specialist
68
20.5%
Trainer
63
19.0%
Expert or SME
55
16.6%
Lead or manager
16
4.8%
Evaluator or reviewer
14
4.2%
Quality assurance
5
1.5%
Analyst or researcher
3
0.9%
Contributor or participant
3
0.9%
Annotator or labeler
2
0.6%
Writer or editor
2
0.6%

Sample. 306 of the 331 roles in Coding & Software Evaluation open on 18 Oct 2026 name one of these words in their title (92.4%); 11 title words are named.

A title can use several of these words ('Expert AI Trainer') and counts for each. The vocabularies are those of the job-titles, languages and expert-fields reports.

Median pay needs at least 8 roles stating an hourly rate.

Source. AITraining.jobs Research, The Market for Coding & Software Evaluation Work, live data.

Figure 11

What the descriptions ask for

Do roles in Coding & Software Evaluation ask for degrees, credentials, experience or tests?

RequirementRolesShare of described roles
Mentions a PhD55
19.2%
Mentions a PhD or master's82
28.7%
Mentions any degree131
45.8%
Mentions a professional credential7
2.4%
States years of experience137
47.9%
Asks for 5 years or more18
6.3%
States weekly hours65
22.7%
Mentions an assessment or test32
11.2%
Mentions an AI-led or video interview29
10.1%
Mentions a background check3
1.0%

Sample. 286 roles in Coding & Software Evaluation open on 18 Oct 2026 whose job board publishes a full description (AfterQuery, Anyone AI, Braintrust, Claru, Handshake AI, Invisible, Lifted (Upwork), Mercor, micro1, OpenTrain AI, Pasiflora AI, Prolific, RemoExperts, Rise Data Labs, Scale AI Human Frontier Collective, Sovrano AI, SuperAnnotate (SME), Terac, Turing, Vetto and Weekday), 86.4% of its open roles; 3,936 described roles across all AI training work.

A mention can be a requirement or a preference ('a PhD is a plus'): the figure counts both. The patterns are those of the requirements report.

Only some platforms publish full descriptions, so this figure describes their roles, not every platform's.

Source. AITraining.jobs Research, The Market for Coding & Software Evaluation Work, live data.

For labs, data vendors and researchers

Buy the data behind this report

The figures above are a summary. Behind them are records we collect ourselves, every day:

  • 10,361 roles tracked, each with its history

    Every role on 36 job boards, read daily since 13 Jul 2026: its pay and place, and the first and last day it was open.

  • 7,464 apply clicks in 28 days

    Which roles people actually apply to, by field, pay and kind of work. It happens on this site, so nobody else can count it.

  • 39 lab and vendor hiring boards

    The job boards of 25 AI labs and 14 human-data vendors, read every day: who is hiring for human data, and who is hiring to buy it.

What you can buy

  • The records

    The rows behind any figure, with their history, not only the totals.

  • A regular feed

    The same figures every week or month, as files.

  • A custom cut or benchmark

    Your countries, languages or fields, or your own platform against the market.

Method and definitions

The public job boards of the AI training platforms this site tracks, read every day. Apply clicks are made on AITraining.jobs; full descriptions come from the platforms whose boards publish them. Every figure is computed by one database query over the window shown, the same query for the live report and for every edition. Each figure states its sample beneath it.

Kind of work
Each role is classified from its title and description into one of the twelve kinds of AI training work this site tracks; this report counts the roles classified as Coding & Software Evaluation.
Fixed panel
The platforms already tracked when the weekly series opens. The index follows their open roles, so a platform added later (such as OpenTrain AI and Welo Data in September 2026) never reads as growth.
Index
The panel's average open roles in a week, divided by the same in the base week, times 100; shown beside the same index for all AI training work on the same platforms.
Open role
A role listed by a given day and still in its platform's feed that day.
New listing
A role that first appeared during the window on a platform already tracked before that week. A platform's first week in this dataset is its back catalogue and is not counted as new.
Removed listing
A role that left its platform's feed during the window.
Days listed
From a removed role's listing date to the last day it was seen in its feed. A median needs at least 10 removed roles.
HHI
Herfindahl-Hirschman Index: the sum of every platform's squared percentage share of open roles, 0 to 10,000. Under 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately, above 2,500 highly concentrated.
Advertised pay
The hourly figure a posting states (the middle of a stated range). Medians need at least 8 roles stating a rate; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile.
Clicks per open role a week
Apply clicks on AITraining.jobs on a specific role, divided by the days the roles were open, times 7.
Demand index
Clicks per open role a week divided by the same rate across every role on the site. Above 1, the roles draw more applicants than the average role.
Listing age
When a role was listed relative to the window's first day: during the window, up to 4 weeks before it, 4 to 12 weeks before or longer. The listing date is the job board's posting date, or else the first day the role appeared in the feed.
Location rule
Read from each posting's location text and, where that names no country, from what the posting's own description states: open worldwide, worldwide except listed countries, only listed countries, or no rule stated.
Open to a country
A role is open to residents of a country if it is open worldwide, its list names the country, or its exclusion list does not. The 20 countries compared are the same in every report of the series.
Window
Live: the last 28 complete days, in UTC, and the last twelve complete ISO weeks (from the week of 3 Aug 2026 at the earliest) for the weekly series. Edition: one calendar month, in UTC, and its weeks.

What this data cannot tell you

  • Platforms that recruit without a public job board are not counted. Several large ones invite workers to projects directly.
  • A listing is not a hire. Some platforms keep evergreen roles open for months, and some post one listing per language or country.
  • Apply clicks measure interest among the people who use AITraining.jobs, and what is shown first gets clicked more. Clicks are never published by platform.
  • Full descriptions are published by a few platforms only, so the requirements figure describes their roles and appears only when at least 10 roles of this kind are described.
  • A kind of work with few open roles gives figures that move with a handful of postings: rows on too little data are marked as a small sample.

How the job feeds are read and roles are classified: site methodology. How fresh, complete and consistent the data is, checked every day: data quality and coverage.

Editions

The live report covers the last 28 complete days and changes every day. Each complete month is also published as an edition, frozen two days after the month ends, so a figure you cite from an edition never moves.

Cite and reuse

Free to quote, chart and republish under CC BY 4.0 with a link to this page. Live figures change daily: cite a monthly edition for numbers that will read the same later, or keep the access date.

Citation

AITraining.jobs (2026). The Market for Coding & Software Evaluation Work (live data, 21 Sep 2026 to 18 Oct 2026). https://aitraining.run/research/coding-ai-training-market (accessed 19 Oct 2026)

BibTeX

@misc{aitrainingjobs_coding_ai_training_market_live,
  author = {{AITraining.jobs}},
  title = {The Market for Coding & Software Evaluation Work (live data, 21 Sep 2026 to 18 Oct 2026)},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://aitraining.run/research/coding-ai-training-market}},
  note = {Accessed 19 Oct 2026},
}
Data: every figure as CSV (one line per value) and JSON, sent to your work email.Pay and open-roles data

More research

The same figures for every other kind of work:

All 78 research reports